Comparison of current automated DNA/RNA extraction systems
Several widely used automated nucleic acid extraction systems on the market today include TurboX 48, QIAGEN QIAcube, and Thermo Fisher KingFisher. This article compiles key information and provides a comparative overview of their advantages and limitations, helping you evaluate and select the most suitable automated DNA/RNA extraction solution for your needs.
Overall, in a simplified comparison
- TurboX 48 offers an automated extraction solution that combines high purity (spin column-based method) with relatively high throughput (48 samples), effectively serving as a “bridge” between smaller systems (QIAcube – 12 samples) and ultra high-throughput platforms (KingFisher – up to 96 samples).
- KingFisher stands out for its maximum throughput and flexibility in reagent selection, making it ideal for laboratories processing very large sample volumes (up to 96 samples per run) or aiming to optimize consumable costs by sourcing reagents from multiple suppliers.
- Meanwhile, QIAcube, although the smallest in scale, provides a simple and reliable solution for small to mid-sized laboratories already familiar with Qiagen kits. Its main drawbacks, however, are limited throughput and relatively high operational (consumable) costs.
The introduction of TurboX 48 brings a compelling alternative—particularly for laboratories seeking to combine the strengths of QIAcube (high-quality extraction) and KingFisher (high throughput) within a single system.
When investing in a system like TurboX 48, many organizations also consider the manufacturer and distributor – factors that can significantly impact operational reliability, technical support, and long-term after-sales service. In this regard, Blue-Ray Biotech, together with Biogroup Vietnam as its exclusive distributor in Vietnam, is committed to delivering practical and reliable support to customers.
